2025-08-252025-08-25https://doi.org/10.64268/jospa.v1i2.11https://doi.org/10.64268/jospa.v1i2.11https://dspace.ufasta.edu.ar/handle/123456789/87213Background: In collaborative-opposition sports, managing training load is essential to ensure optimal planning and performance development. Among all components, the technical-tactical (TT) aspect is the foundation of the game. However, its high complexity makes it difficult to approach and quantify effectively. Aim: This narrative review aimed to critically analyze existing proposals for TT load management and to synthesize a new, improved alternative to support practitioners in collaborative-opposition sports. Methods: A general search was conducted using Google Scholar to identify the most widely cited non-technological approaches to TT load management. Only proposals that used templates without the aid of technology were included. A critical analysis was performed to examine the strengths and limitations of each identified model. The insights gained were then integrated to formulate a new and more functional proposal. Results: Three relevant proposals using non-technological templates were identified. Each was critically examined, with attention given to their practical contributions and inherent limitations. By integrating the positive aspects of each while addressing their weaknesses, a new TT load management model was developed. Conclusion: The synthesized proposal provides a simple yet ecologically valid tool for managing technical-tactical load in collaborative-opposition sports. Its ease of application and contextual relevance make it a valuable resource for coaches and practitioners seeking effective, accessible methods to support player development.Fil: Costa, Ignacio Alejandro. Universidad Fasta. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.es_ARTechnical-tacticalMonitoring training loadCollaborative-opposition sportsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article